![]() |
|
|
about the author... ![]() Brian Thomas ...is the minister of music at Kaleo Church in San Diego, CA. His band is named Bezalel after the first artisan of the Bible. He also is an artist represented by the Artist Forum Gallery of Kensington. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Biblical History from Puget Sound Christian College (but don't hold that against him). He is a Fellow of the Kaleo Institute of Cultural Research where he will be heading up the department of Worship and the Arts in 2005.
|
Christianity & the Arts by Brian Thomas
“The Christian is the one whose imagination should fly beyond the stars.” Francis Schaeffer Introduction:
What role should the arts play in the Christian life? By “arts” I mean all vehicles of creative expression, including but not limited to: painting, sculpture, music, architecture, fashion, photography, dance, television and film. Can art be used to the glory of God or is it just another way of sneaking sin in through the back door? There has been a sharp decline in the importance and cultivation of the arts in the evangelical community over the past century, and it has been to our detriment. The enjoyment of God's creation and man's creativity as God's image-bearers have been relegated to the basement of Christian consciousness, often looked upon as a worldly pursuit. I believe this has been one of the major contributing factors leading to Christianity's ineffectiveness upon our culture. As British satirist, P.G. Wodehouse said, “Whenever Christians, and evangelicals in particular, have attempted to ‘reach the world' through the media – TV, film, publishing and so on – the thinking public gets the firm idea that, like soup in a bad restaurant, Christians' brains are better left unstirred.” If we wish to regain even a small foothold of influence in today's world, we must begin with a fresh study of the subject from God's perspective. Some of the world's greatest paintings, sculptures, architecture, and music have been inspired by the Christian faith. The Bible has much to say about beauty, art, and mankind's enjoyment of creativity as a good gift of the Creator. Beauty is in the Eye of the Ultimate Beholder Aesthetics is the branch of philosophy that is concerned with beauty. Throughout history philosophers and artists have sought to answer the question, “What is beautiful?” The tired cliché, “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder,” is taken as gospel truth without a second thought today. But this is actually an attempt of marrying the philosophy of relativism and aesthetics. What is beautiful? The relativist answers: Whatever I think is beautiful, because I am the measure of all things.
Beauty is only possible if we assume God's existence as the Great Artist who made color, shape, and texture. True beauty is in the eye of the Ultimate Beholder of all things because God is the measure of all things, including beauty. Is a flower in the desert beautiful even though no man ever sees it? Yes. Since the God who created it sees it, it is beautiful regardless of whether man ever sees it. Gene Veith aptly points out, “Just as the current intellectual establishment has lost its conceptual basis for truth, the artistic establishment has lost its conceptual basis for beauty. A Christian view of the arts can supply both.” Imago Dei The support for the arts and man's creativity comes very early in Scripture. In the book of Genesis you see the Master Artist creating ex nihilo (out of nothing). At the very onset of creation the prerequisites for art are established – light, space, and unity. God then created the details, calling forth earth, vegetation, water, and finally human beings:
Humans were created in the image and likeness of God, who were themselves empowered to create. This is central in understanding our humanity. It means, among other things, that since God is personal, human beings are personal. As Veith points out, “Those qualities that go into being a person – consciousness, the capacity to think and to feel, to will, act, respond, communicate, and enter into relationships – are inherent in human beings as in no other part of creation.” Part of God's personality is his ability to create, a capacity inherent in those who are his image-bearers. In the Genesis account above, you see that man was given dominion over the world. This dominion has implications for and includes, the arts, since an artist does nothing more than fashion his art out of the materials of the earth in one way or another. Although the beauty of the garden was vandalized through man's fall into sin, and nature itself was cursed, it was not completely effaced. Sin shattered the divine image in man, but did not erase it altogether. Man's ability to create after the fall remains as a signpost pointing to God's original artistry in creation. The universe God created is not only functional; it is also beautiful. Being made in the image of God means that the purpose of life is greater than just surviving, as if life were nothing more than a bigger version of the Survivor reality show. We have the ability not only to perceive beauty, but also to create and enjoy God through our creations. The impulse within us to create and enjoy is an inescapable mark of the divine image. _____________________ P.G. Wodehouse as quoted by Franky Schaeffer, Addicted to Mediocrity , (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1981), p. 11. Gene Edward Veith, Jr. State of the Arts: From Bezalel to Mapplethorpe , (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1991) p. 21. See Anthony A. Hoekema, Created in God's Image , (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1986), for a more comprehensive study of this doctrine. I highly recommend this book. You've quoted several of the books I'm putting together for the Resource Corner at the 3rd Annual Arts Worship Sabbath event in Orlando (www.ArtsWorshipSabbath.org). I don't have the Hoekema book in my library so I'm going to check it out (although it sounds familiar). The Air I Breathe Wonderful to hear these comments and thought provoking comments. In particular I appreciate the idea of the "ultimate beholder". However, from our fall scarred positions, will we fall into the trap of deciding for God what is "Art"? The snobbery of the Art world is very prevalent, almost gnostic in its determination of what is art. My journey of late has caused me to think about creativity as part of being an imager of God. Creativity involves change (scary), but mostly carrying an aspect of aliveness, vitality, newness or freshness. Vitruvius used the word delight. Perhaps we can say that "art" that promotes 'death' and not 'life' is bad 'art'. Good art does not have to be limited to the esoteric since we all inherently can enjoy life.
Exactly what I was looking for...
Print-friendly version of this page Mail this article
|